Studia Litterarum Studia Litterarum 2500-4247 IWL RAS https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-10-27 Research Article Articles Time in Narrative: “Fabula — Syuzhet” and “Story — Discourse” vs Semiotic Triangle Maslov Evgeniy S. red@studlit.ru September 25, 2023 2023 November 11, 2022 The article explores the essence of the cognate oppositions “fabula — syuzhet” and “story — discourse” through the prism of the semiotic triangle concept. The “corners” of the semiotic triangle (thing, thought, symbol) are not aspects of one and the same phenomenon, but independent types of phenomena, and each of them has its own temporality. The author proves that the substance of the plot / discourse is a thought (sense), and not a text as a unity of sense and its acoustic-graphic expression. The time of the syuzhet / discourse (the time of thinking about the object) can not only differ from the time of the fabula / story, but fundamentally does not need it, since it has a different ontological basis; as a consequence, its counterpart exists in any kind of text, not just in narrative. If the text presents events to the reader in the mode of sensual “pseudo-living,” the time of the syuzhet / discourse tends to coincide with the time of the fabula / story. But the rational grasp, based on abstraction, allows thinking to use for its movement not only temporal, but also other “dimensions” of the described material. fabula syuzhet story discourse narrative semiotic triangle time temporality Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS 2026 1 Bremond, C. “Logika povestvovatel’nykh vozmozhnostei” [“Logic of Narrative Possibilities”], trans. from French by N.L. Razgon. Semiotika i iskusstvometriia: sovremennye zarubezhnye issledovaniia (sbornik perevodov) [Semiotics and Artmetry: Modern Foreign Studies (Collection of Translations)], comp. and ed. by Iu.M. Lotman and V.M. Petrov. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1972, pp. 108–135. (In Russ.) 2 Efimenko, A.E. “Ot sujet k siuzhetu i dalee k syuzhet” [“From Sujet to Plot and Further to Syuzhet”]. Shagi / Steps, vol. 5, no. 2, 2019, pp. 10–35. DOI: 10.22394/2412-9410-2019-5-2-10-35 (In Russ.) 3 Genette, G. “Povestvovatel’nyi diskurs” [“Narrative Discourse”], trans. from Franch by N. Pertsov. Genette, G. Figury: v 2 t. [Figures: in 2 vols.], vol. 2. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo imeni Sabashnikovykh Publ., 1998, pp. 60–282. (In Russ.) 4 Medvedev, P.N. “Formal’nyi metod v literaturovedenii. Kriticheskoe vvedenie v sotsiologicheskuiu poetiku” [“Formal Method in Literary Studies. Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics”]. Bakhtin, M.M. Freidizm. Formal’nyi metod v literaturovedenii. Marksizm i filosofiia iazyka. Stat’i [Freudianism. Formal Method in Literary Criticism. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Articles], comp., textological prep. by I.V. Peshkov, comm. by V.L. Makhlin, I.V. Peshkov. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 2000, pp. 185–348. (In Russ.) 5 Ricoeur, P. Vremia i rasskaz [Time and Narrative], vol. 1, trans. from French by T.V. Slavko. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaia kniga Publ., 1998. 313 p. (In Russ.) 6 Strawson, P.F. Individy. Opyt deskriptivnoi metafiziki [Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics], trans. from English by V.N. Briushinkin, V.A. Chalyi. Kaliningrad, Immanuel Kant Russian State University Publ., 2009. 328 p. (In Russ.) 7 Tomashevskii, B.V. Teoriia literatury. Poetika [Theory of Literature. Poetics], introd. article by N.D. Tamarchenko, comm. by S.N. Broitman with the participation of N.D. Tamarchenko. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2002. 334 p. (In Russ.) 8 Tiupa, V.I. Vvedenie v sravnitel’nuiu narratologiiu [Introduction to Comparative Narratology]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 2016. 145 p. (In Russ.) 9 White, H. Metaistoriia: Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka [Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th-Century Europe], trans. from English, ed. E.G. Trubina and V.V. Kharitonov. Ekaterinburg, Ural University Publ., 2002. 528 p. (In Russ.) 10 Frege, G. “O smysle i znachenii” [“On Sense and Meaning”]. Frege, G. Logika i logicheskaia semantika: sbornik trudov [Logic and Logical Semantics: Collection of Works], trans. from German by B.V. Biriukov, ed. by Z.A. Kuzicheva. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2000, pp. 230–246. (In Russ.) 11 Shklovskii, V.B. “Parodiinyi roman ʽTristram Shendi’ Sterna” [“The Novel as Parody: Sterne’s ʽTristram Shandy’.”]. Shklovskii, V.B. O teorii prozy [Theory of Prose]. Moscow, Federatsiia Publ., 1929, pp. 177–204. (In Russ.) 12 Sсhmid, W. Narratologiia [Narratology]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., 2003. 312 p. (In Russ.) 13 Bal, Mieke. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. 2nd ed. Toronto, Buffalo, University of Toronto Press Inc., 1997. XV, 254 p. (In English) 14 Bridgeman, Teresa. “Time and Space.” Herman, David, editor. The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 52–65. (In English) 15 Calatrava, Jose R. Valles. “Hacia una nueva propuesta teorica de sistematizacion de los estratos del texto narrativo. Fabula, trama y relato como planos funcional, actuacional y discursive.” Revista de Literatura, vol. LXXVIII, no. 156, 2016, pp. 345–367. DOI: 10.3989/revliteratura.2016.02.014 (In Spanish) 16 Chatman, Seymour B. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 1978. 277 p. (In English) 17 Culler, Jonathan D. The Pursuit of Signs. Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction, with a new preface by the author. London, Routledge, 2001. XXV, 272 p. (In English) 18 Goodman, Nelson. The Structure of Appearance. 3rd ed., with an introd. by Geoffrey Hellman. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1977. 294 p. (In English) 19 Klauk, Tobias, and Tilmann Koppe, and Thomas Weskott. “Empirical Correlates of Narrative Closure.” Diegesis, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, pp. 26–42. (In English) 20 McHale, Brian. “Beginning to Think about Narrative in Poetry.” Narrative, no. 17, 2009, pp. 11–30. DOI: 10.1353/nar.0.0014 (In English) 22 Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London, New York, Methuen, 1983. XI, 173 p. (In English) 23 Ryan, Marie-Laure. “Narrative.” Herman, David, and Manfred Jahn, and Marie- Laure Ryan, editors. Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London, New York, Routledge, 2005, pp. 344–348. (In English) 24 Samartzi, Stavroula, and Smaragda Kazi, and Miltiadis Koustoumbardis. “Logical and Experiential Time in Narratives.” Vatakis, Argiro, and Anna Esposito, and Maria Giagkou, and Fred Cummins, and Georgios Papadelis, editors. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Time and Time Perception. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2011, pp. 275–289. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21478-3_21 (In English) 25 Todorov, Tzvetan. “Categories of the Literary Narrative,” trans. from French by Ann Goodman. Erens, Patricia, and Bill Horrigan, editors. Film Reader 2: Narrative Structures, Industry, Technology, Ideology. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press, 1977, pp. 19–37. (In English)